1) Presentation of research, as it is born, as has been done, arrangements will be handled through the data collected, our questions departure. The presentation of the 'interview, and his work, and his views about the role it plays, the atmosphere we breathe using tools etc. ...
2) Questions about the "recruitment", as was the case, orally or informally via e-mail invitation, and then more formal ? It has been proposed as a champion, or was invited ? What were the initial expectations (and have been disappointed), what reasons led him to accept an interest in the project ?
He decided to become champion because:
-Am was invited by the programmers and I am intrigued.
-To do a favor for programmers.
-I have been informed by other Champon and I am intrigued.
-I heard about it and I'm interested.
-I inform you of the news and I always like to attend.
First login: first impression, the platform is curious, banal, interactive ?
3) Please give us recall some details of his use of the platform in reference all'ulimo month
Highlight implementing two activities more frequently and more rarely two.
-Chatto
-Mando e-mail I read newspaper
-
-Rierco info from profiles
-Update my profile
-participant discussion forum
-
send feedback-control events
average, each as access to the internet and the platform ?
-Daily
-2 / 3 times a week once a week
-1 -2 -1
times a month once a month on average for each access
how long stays connected, and within Platform ?
-More than 5 hours
-3 to 5 hours
-1 hour-less than 30 minutes-less than 10 minutes
semantic differential.
as it is considered an expert in the use of the platform, da1 --------------------- 10
When the platform is problematic, 1 ----------------- ------ 10
{if 1 / 5, and therefore is not problematic because it is not? if 6 / 10 is problematic because it?}
4) Social Platform: presentation list connected only with the login and role, to identify relationships born from the platform: having the card in front of ...
I indicate that 5 people ... more contact 12345
Once the description is asked to indicate for each colleague cited:
degree of friendship between 1 and 10
degree of complicity 1 to 10
able to tune from 1 to 10
ties maintained by the platform:
- all existed before?
- have reinforced?
- have been weakened?
- are born again?
- sn remain virtual?
5) Question privacy and confidentiality of information exchanged:
- What type of information normally considered to be exchanged on a chat?
- There are arguments taboo, which normally does not deal at work, or not dealt with on the platform?
- If they had access also figures "sensitive" (group leaders, directors, heads etc. ...) how to change?
In this respect you are very, very, not at all agree with:
- In a work environment, non-public personal information.
- My boss can access all my information so I do not put sensitive data.
- Not the best way to prefer other ways your personal information.
- talk about anything.
Suggestions? ( not inherent in the computer part of the platform, but the social ):
- He feels the 'need to create a private chatroom, or space theme at the moment?
- According to her, 'useful become invisible?
- Suggest to control and / or restrict access to certain information?
