The interview (which will have an average duration of 30/40 minutes will touch briefly the following points:
1) Presentation of research, as it is born, as was done, how will be handled through the data collected, the questions start, etc. ... and interviewer, and what role that indications do it starting, its assumptions and impressions. From this perspective it is hoped that once this research is the researcher clicks automatically or almost -----> presentation of the 'interview, and his work, and his views about the role it plays, the atmosphere that breathe using tools etc. ...
2) Questions Regarding " recruitment " , as was the case, orally or informally via e-mail invitation, and then more formal? It has been proposed as a champion, or has been invited? What were your initial expectations (and have been disappointed), what reasons led him to accept an interest in the project?
First login: first impression, the platform is curious? Trivial?
3) the main mode of use of the platform, how many times you connect to the media, how long stays connected? and when? How
uses piattafroma from
1 --------------------- 10
as it is considered an expert in the use of the platform
1 --------------------- 10
When the platform is problematic
1 ----------- ------------ 10
(the quantitative application)
if 1 / 5, and therefore is not problematic because it does not it?
if 6 / 10 is problematic because it?
(qualitative part question)
semantic differential.
Active - Passive
Efficient - Inefficient
Global - Local
Public - Private
Formal - Informle
Monotone - Colored
Dynamic - Static
Triste - Alegro
Staff - Collective
Fun - Annoying
Interactive - Set
Superificiale - Deep
4) Relationship soaicli Platform: Overview list colleagues also sl with the login and role, to identify relationships born from the platform: having the card in front of ...
I indicate that 5 people more frequently ...
1 2 3
4
5
description of the type of relationship, you already knew? Now they feel more often, you see more frquentemente? (Qualitative part of the application)
Once the description is asked to indicate for each colleague cited:
degree of friendship between 1 and 10
degree of complicity from 1 to 10
able to tune from 1 to 10
(the quantitative part of the application)
5) Question privacy and confidentiality of information exchanged, what kind of information normally considered to be exchanged on a chat? figures even if they have access "sensitive" (group leaders, directors, heads etc. ...) how to change? In this regard:
You are very, very, not at all agree with :
In a work environment, non-public personal information.
My boss can access all my information I do not put so data semsibili.
is not the best way to learn personally I prefer other methods.
talk about anything
There are taboo topics , which normally does not deal at work, or not dealt with on the platform?
Suggestions? (Not related to the computer part of the platform, but the social need for example to create a private chatroom, or thematic areas, or become invisible or to control access to certain information)
The sample to be interviewed not is representative random, but weighted, in particular, it was decided to request the cooperation of: Users often
5 / 6
human use 2 / 3
Users who are experiencing technical issues 2 / 3.
